German wrote:Goffel wrote:The more I read, the more flaws I get.......please give me a couple of days to sort out wording and laws...Dont all run out and buy Halon extinguishers..(I am in Part 135, so now am having to do some seeeeeerious reading).
All I can say is as far as extinguishers and 1st Aid kits go, use common sense, and carry one...just think of your children flying in that a/c...you would want the best for them.
At least we are are going to sort this out properly what is needed and what is not.
Much thanks for your patience.
Goffel.
Arnulf
Julle is soos n klomp ou vrouens.Hoe gaan jy voel as jou trike op die grond aan die brand slaan en jy het nie n brandblusser nie EN DIT STEEK NOG N KLOMP AERIES/GOED AAN DIE BRAND?
"COMMON SENSE"
German, Bist Du wirklich Deutsch?
I think classifying us as a "klomp ou vrouens" is a bit inappropriate. I do not know how much knowledge and training you had regarding fire fighting and the use of different types of fire extinguishers. CAA specifies a halon extingisher to carried. The reason for specifying a halon fire extinguisher is, that it is the most appropriate type of fire extingisher to fight a fire in a confined space, with limited toxity to the operator. A small handheld halon fire extinguisher is rather unsuitable for use if your trike catches fire during start. If you are worried about that risk, you need a ground crew, with a suitable fire extinguisher.
Strange how we worry about stuff that are quite unlikely to happen, but observe and take part in operations that can be classified as gross negligence. Our real fire hazzard is the way we handle fuel. Aircraft get refuelled without any earth cables, very often inside hangars. To crown it all, very often the person refuelling the aircraft is having a smoke.
Do you really think a little tiny 1.5 kg halon extinguisher will help, if the can of fuel you are holding sets alight due to a static discharge? If CAA is really worried about fire hazzards and safety, they would send their clever inspectors around and try educate the flying fraternity about fire hazzards, and how to limit and manage the risks. But the preferred approach is the spietkop approach. Enforce the fire extinguisher rule, regardless how daft it is, and ignore the real problem areas. And then we have the real "klomp ou vrouens" who just say yes, comply with the rules, blissfully unaware where the real risks and threats are, and without the smallest effort in trying to manage these risks and threats.
Having a 1 kg halon extinguisher in a trike is daft, and does in no way contribute to safety.
Having a few 12 kg powder and CO2 extinguishers close by when refuelling and startin aeroplanes is very clever, and contributes to safety.
Regards,
Ou vrou.