Is this the end of microlighting in S.A. ?

Matters of general interest
User avatar
Carel
Survived first engine out
Survived first engine out
Posts: 253
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 2:33 pm
Location: Windhoek, Namibia

Engines

Postby Carel » Fri Feb 01, 2008 11:27 am

There are several alternative engines available - even from Rotax fitted into jetski`s, etc without the the strict maintanance as for their "aviation" engines.

Quite a few other "aviation" engines also with less strict maintanance schedules at prices that compares well with Rotax.

Rotax (SA) can suffer financially should a compromise not be reached.

Waiting with suspense to hear and see A E proposal.

Maybe it is time to be more open minded about other ML aviation and non aviation engines ?
User avatar
ICEMAN
Top Gun
Top Gun
Posts: 695
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 4:05 pm
Location: Hoedspruit Hangar 8

Postby ICEMAN » Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:15 pm

Gents, has there ever been any surveys into the use of motorcycle engines as a powerplants..... im thinking here along the lines of the BMW GS ranges eg the 1100, 1150, 1200 boxer motors........ perhaps even the dakar ranges or the honda transalp 650s... the motors are all compact, light, powerful and reliable :?:
ZU-CPW..... t/bird mk2
Hoedspruit Civil Airfield
Hangar 8
User avatar
RV4ker (RIP)
The Big Four K
The Big Four K
Posts: 5386
Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 7:48 pm
Location: The Coves & FAVB

Postby RV4ker (RIP) » Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:27 pm

Does a Rattex engine have a data plate? If you remove it is it still a rattex engine? If not how do they prove that it is a rattex engine?

I went through this with the Lyconosaurus fitted to the RV. Only reason I have not chucked it (although I have removed it) is that I want IF ATF and they will only give me IF if it better maintained than a brand new TCA aerie :?
4 Sale (will trade)
P166S, Jodel, hangar and other odds and sods
Radial - http://tiny.cc/eppqp
Still @ The Coves (Harties) but dream has died
User avatar
Woody
Learning to fly
Learning to fly
Posts: 61
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 6:45 pm
Location: Microland

Postby Woody » Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:39 pm

MORNING ICEMAN
We need to get a box of popcorn and juice on this one.This is the time when that other engin"powerplant" you know the one im referring to ...be ready to go on the market.Ill be the first to dump "rattax" and get something more aviation friendly.
And yet all we want to do is fly to get away from politics.I hope some sollution will be found before it's to late.
Cheers
Johnny
So what - wood can also fly!
User avatar
skybound®
Frequent Flyer
Frequent Flyer
Posts: 1223
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 12:51 pm
Location: Port Elizabeth

Postby skybound® » Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:41 pm

Bloody good question RV4ker. Wonder what the implications are.

Reminds me of work. Often in a responsible IT shop, we have to protect our users and more so the firm's reputation. This sometimes leads to implementing some technologies that restrict user's access to some resources. It is always amazing that human nature is then to find a work around so that users are able to access the very things we were attempting to restrict. There are many parrallels. Time to take a leaf out of our users books. :wink:

At this stage with the cost implications of maintaining these two strokes, I am beginning to think that it is not a coincidence that the motors are called a RoTAX. It is a conspiracy by SARS I tell you :wink: :lol:
User avatar
RudiGreyling
Top Gun
Top Gun
Posts: 695
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 9:10 am
Location: The Coves
Contact:

Postby RudiGreyling » Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:46 pm

HI Guys,

Sorry I don't have time to debate, hit and run...

Mike B, had a meeting yesterday at CAA, go read his comments on the new misasa website:
http://misasa.flyeaaforum.com/?p=300

Want more info on the new website, go here
viewtopic.php?t=6502

Regards
Rudi
"Science, freedom, beauty, adventure - Aviation offers it all"
http://www.RudiGreyling.com
User avatar
Gyronaut
Toooooo Thousand
Toooooo Thousand
Posts: 2265
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 4:26 pm
Location: Morningstar - Cape Town, Western Cape

Postby Gyronaut » Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:51 pm

I see the BMW1200 boxer puts out 122 hp at 7,500 rpm. Seems better than a Rattex 914F which puts out only 110 hp at 5,800 rpm or am I confused? Ok so it doesnt have 2 plugs per piston etc... but is that an issue?
User avatar
Duck Rogers
Toooooo Thousand
Toooooo Thousand
Posts: 2318
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 9:49 pm
Location: West Rand

Postby Duck Rogers » Fri Feb 01, 2008 1:07 pm

Aviation Engines wrote:I have finally finished and sent through a proposal to CAA and if adopted by them will resolve this matter to the satisfaction of all role players in the industry.
That's very nice Niren...........but don't you think you should have let the most important "role players", that's us, Microlighters, see this proposal and comment on it before submitting it? What happened to transparency? I for one would seriously like to see this document.
Airspeed, altitude, or brains....you always need at least two
User avatar
ICEMAN
Top Gun
Top Gun
Posts: 695
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 4:05 pm
Location: Hoedspruit Hangar 8

Postby ICEMAN » Fri Feb 01, 2008 1:19 pm

Bloody good question RV4ker. Wonder what the implications are.
Will we need an authorized approved AP to remove the data plate... :?: :twisted:
ZU-CPW..... t/bird mk2
Hoedspruit Civil Airfield
Hangar 8
User avatar
Rudix
The Boss
The Boss
Posts: 1653
Joined: Sun May 07, 2006 8:04 pm
Location: Pretoria - Rhino Park
Contact:

Postby Rudix » Fri Feb 01, 2008 1:20 pm

JetRanger wrote:I see the BMW1200 boxer puts out 122 hp at 7,500 rpm. Seems better than a Rattex 914F which puts out only 110 hp at 5,800 rpm or am I confused? Ok so it doesnt have 2 plugs per piston etc... but is that an issue?
It actually DOES have 2 plugs per cylinder :D

Great motor, just need to make sure you have the gearbox sorted out.

Fly safe,
Rudi
"Never be afraid to try something new. Remember that a lone amateur built the Ark. A large group of professionals built the Titanic." ;)
User avatar
Tumbleweed
Toooooo Thousand
Toooooo Thousand
Posts: 2349
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 7:14 pm
Location: FASC

Postby Tumbleweed » Fri Feb 01, 2008 1:51 pm

Does anyone know what are the trends in the UK/ USA/ Aussi regarding Rotex maintenance? Maybe, instead of re- inventing the wheel, apply their common sense?

With fu#$ups. comes oppertunity.

What if some engineering company opens a CAA approved,'RATAX' 583 MK2 High performance, fuel injected Rotex service exchange?

High performance / polished crank, gas flow heads - everything to improve but lose manufacturer warrenty and have the re-builder's 1500 hour reccomended maintenance apply?

The idea then of having enjoyed 300 hours, paying a bit ?? for a superior rebuild with a 1500 hour extended tbo motor maintenence schedule does'nt sound as bad?

Can think of some seriously advanced motor engineering set- ups that could give credit to something like this?

OK, now's probably not a good time to say 912S rules? :twisted: :lol:
Sling ZU FYE - For Your Entertainment
User avatar
Wargames
Frequent Flyer
Frequent Flyer
Posts: 1353
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2008 2:00 pm
Location: Morningstar, Cape Town

Postby Wargames » Fri Feb 01, 2008 2:24 pm

Mike Blyth wrote:In summary - in the short term:
For Rotax 582 engine owners - we are hoping the CAA will allow extensions to the 300 hour crankshaft replacement schedule.
For Rotax 503 engine owners - the crankshaft only needs to be replaced if necessary.
Best news ever. I do have a 503 engine. So this would mean that my maintenance is on par. This mean that I can go and fly legally.

Or am I missing something here.
The Naked Trike
ZU-AVL
"I hate CIRCLIPS!!"
User avatar
skybound®
Frequent Flyer
Frequent Flyer
Posts: 1223
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 12:51 pm
Location: Port Elizabeth

Postby skybound® » Fri Feb 01, 2008 2:30 pm

I think the regulation as it currently stands needs to be re-read.
24.03.1
(1) A non-type certificated aircraft, specified in subregulation 24.01.1 (1) and classified in the paragraphs (a) to (g) of subregulation24.01.1(2), shall be maintained in accordance with its Approved Maintenance Schedule in such a manner that it is airworthy at the commencement of any flight.
The General overhaul (crank issue) is only 1 of 40 items on the Rotax maintenance schedule. I would suggest that you are only airworthy if all other 39 items are also up to date.
User avatar
Wargames
Frequent Flyer
Frequent Flyer
Posts: 1353
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2008 2:00 pm
Location: Morningstar, Cape Town

Postby Wargames » Fri Feb 01, 2008 2:35 pm

Skybound,

My engine had a piston replaced at 400 hours and is currently standing on 420. Al other maintenance is done according to plan. I have about 5 hours before I need to replace spark plugs and gearbox oil.

Am I missing something?? Can I go and fly legally, and what will "speedcop" say if they stop me at airfield??
The Naked Trike
ZU-AVL
"I hate CIRCLIPS!!"
Chunky
Woohoo 100 posts - flying high
Woohoo 100 posts - flying high
Posts: 105
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 8:35 pm

Postby Chunky » Fri Feb 01, 2008 2:55 pm

I was at CAA this morning. They are going to issue a statement regarding the crank issue today or shortly.

Looks like they may extend to either 400 or 450 but nothing past that. They are not going to bend on this rule at all. So if you are close to 300 hours you may get an extension at their discretion. If you are at 450 sorry for you but you need a new crank.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests