Not sure if is specific to Thunderbirds specifically, which is what I trained on, but all those at the school that I trained at and who started from scratch e.g. no previous flying time, qualfied at over 50 hrs with the exception of 1 who was in the early 40hrs
The problem or delay in training seems to come with the landings.
I spoke to a PPL converting to microlight who was battling with his landings who said that in a cessna one relied on settings -ie you knew you needed to be at x height at x distance from the field dropping at x amount of ft per min at x rpm. A microlight did not work the same way and needed more input from the pilot, especially with cross winds, variants in weather etc. He had no problems on the Cessna but was struggling with the T-Bird
So my question then is:
Is a microlight more difficult to train on then a conventional PPL type a/c ? or is it just the Thunderbird that is a difficult type of a/c to train on?
Constructive comments would be apreciated.
