Postby HennivR » Sun May 28, 2017 7:17 am
Hi again all,
Herewith the feedback I received from the KRnet:
1. With regards to the wings mounted at the fuselage:
I'll leave the Roy Marsh questions to Bruce, but it's a different airfoil than the plans call for and is also thinner in terms of percent chord. It also had a higher stall speed and landing speed than a stock KR. People are often impressed with the roughly 192 average mph speed that he scored in a race, but consider that his engine was turbocharged, and it may have been a one-way race like Airventure Cup, where a tailwind can make your speed look really good...
For the record, the Roy Marsh KR2S wings measure 7’3” from hinge bolt hole to tip, with almost full width aileron...9” shorter than the wing.
They are somewhat tapered, to my surprise. Tape shows 4’ wide at the hinge plane, and 35” at the tips, which are upturned slightly at the trailing edge. Can’t say much about the airfoil section but they are exactly 6” thick at thickest point at root.
Of course, it is possible that they are not as original, but I think they are.
2. With regards to the magneto:
Regarding your second question about a drop in magneto. Yes, there is a Vertex magneto that will drop in in place of the distributor on the VW. However, you have to make big hump in your forward cowl to accommodate it. If you search out some of the older pictures of KRs, especially in the newsletters onMark Langford's web site, I'm sure you run across some examples.
The hump Jeff is talking about is considerable, like 8" or more, if it's what I remember from the earliest Beetle racing days, and very heavy.
Advance may be an issue also...I think it is limited.
> Does this mean then that the said magneto is much larger than the standard distributor?
It's at least twice as tall as the stock distributor, closer to 10", and twice the diameter, unless there are others than the one I remember being the rage in the early VW racing days.
3. With regards to the PSRU:
Some folks have successfully used reduction drives on KRs. Randy Smith's (Less Palmer) super KR would be an example. However, in most instances you are better off to skip the reduction unit since you can't swing a long prop on most KRs due to ground clearance issues. With the shorter prop you would use with most KRs, the prop tip speed will still be low enough that you can turn the VW 3300 rpm or higher (some run up to 3700 rpm) without overspeeding the prop. It's best to go direct drive and save the weight.
To add to what Jeff said, I will throw this out...VW Type 1 engines are already stretched to near the limit of their valve cooling capability at
3200 rpm continuous operation, even when cooled in a fast moving KR.
Bolting on a reduction drive and turning up the wick to 4400 rpm would substantially reduce the time between valve jobs...and failures. That's another reason you don't see many PSRUs on VWs.
Currently I am busy with a project away from home. As soon as I'm back around mid June, I'll start purchasing tools, wood & glue and shortly thereafter will start uploading some fresh construction pics.
In the meantime, this was one of the last airframes I built from scratch. Wood used: Saligna. Glue used: As per the pic in the previous post.
That's all for now.
Cheers,
Henni
-
Attachments
-

-

-

-

-

-
