
Amongst lots of questions, one was raised at the AGM whether AeCSA membership is compulsory.
The answer was NO.
"BUT, but, but, but ... if your AP/AMO is not an AeCSA member, then his signature on your inspection list is not valid". This is the item I deem as unconstitutional !
Therefor, (now RAASA gets involved), RAASA cannot issue you with your ATF (who decided that my AP must be a AeCSA member if RAASA handles ATF's on behalve of CAA ?).
SAHPA (hang gliders, PG's and PPG's) and RC's don't have AMO's, yet are/have to be members of (ineffecient) AeCSA

What needs to happen is:
RAASA becomes exclusive to licensing as delegated by CAA.
AeCSA becomes exlusive to members interest and rights, e.g. airspace, transponders etc., but independent from CAA and RAASA. Purely a body representing interests of GA. But so does AOPA. So does MISASA, so does SAHPA.
Yuk, rather confusing ...
And all I wanted was to fly open skies in Africa with basically a yearly aerie inspection, health check and flying license with one logbook ...
