

he he heMorph wrote: It did take him longer to master and he has already had a incident wrt a prop-strike that wouldn't have happened on a tricycle version.
I heard once, it's not if a taildragger bites you, it's when.
I agree with the last part of your reply but if you taxi a KR2 at 85mph you are looking for K@k.Henni wrote: Of everything I've attempted to fly, the KR2 that I built was the most difficult on the ground. In my flight tests I taxied it up to 85mph indicated on the ground at Vanderbylpark.
So, if you built or assemble any aircraft & you do have a choice, rather go for the tricycle option. Makes life much less complicated.
Henni
I dont like a carburotor on top of an engine with a static fuel feed. The needle and seat does not block the fuel 100% and over time you contaminate the oil. The 1st time yo forget to turn the fuel off, while parking in the hanger, you end up with petrol or Avgas in the sump.Henni wrote:Willie,
85 mph was the highest speed attainable on the ground and I wanted to test the effect of the super strong belly brake I've installed.
I made very, very sure to push the stick very forward during those taxi tests and never at any stage did she try to leave the ground.
Regards,
Henni
Amper soos 'n melk stoelBoet wrote:Mogas, die lyk darem ook maar MOOI ne?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests