582 vs 912

Matters of general interest
User avatar
skybound®
Frequent Flyer
Frequent Flyer
Posts: 1223
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 12:51 pm
Location: Port Elizabeth

582 vs 912

Postby skybound® » Fri Oct 26, 2007 2:14 pm

Has anyone ever done the calculation of working out the running cost of a 582 vs 912, assuming that ALL items in both maintenance schedules are adhered to.

With the shorter TBO of the two stroke - perhaps the cost of ownership of a 912 is not that far off a 582 as some of us may think? May be an interesting comparison.
User avatar
Slider
Look I'm flying
Look I'm flying
Posts: 209
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 8:26 am
Location: Gauteng
Contact:

Postby Slider » Fri Oct 26, 2007 2:47 pm

All I have noticed is that most of the Rotax service bulletins that come out are for 912’s and you hardly see anything for 2 strokes??? :shock: :shock: :shock:

503 rules the "donkey list" :lol: :lol: :lol:
ZU-ALW
Hanger 5-7
Microland
120.35
User avatar
skybound®
Frequent Flyer
Frequent Flyer
Posts: 1223
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 12:51 pm
Location: Port Elizabeth

Postby skybound® » Fri Oct 26, 2007 3:04 pm

Slider wrote:All I have noticed is that most of the Rotax service bulletins that come out are for 912’s and you hardly see anything for 2 strokes??? :shock: :shock: :shock:

503 rules the "donkey list" :lol: :lol: :lol:
Quite right - perhaps it has something to do with the two strokes not being meant for aircraft (the Rotax disclaimer discussed on another thread), whereas the 912 is targetted at aircraft use, so they probably have to be a bit more carefull and responsible.
User avatar
Slider
Look I'm flying
Look I'm flying
Posts: 209
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 8:26 am
Location: Gauteng
Contact:

Postby Slider » Fri Oct 26, 2007 3:17 pm

What about a Rotax / Jabiru / whatever list, compairing them to each other??
ZU-ALW
Hanger 5-7
Microland
120.35
User avatar
Griffin
The sky is all mine
The sky is all mine
Posts: 498
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 10:38 am
Location: Cape Town/FAFK

Postby Griffin » Fri Oct 26, 2007 6:21 pm

You are correct. I did an estimate a few years ago when we were thinking of building a B/Baby. The average cost per hour, including the initial capital cost of the motor, over the TBO life time of one 912 is a lot lower than that of the 582 motors. It changes a bit if you ignore the factory recomendations and replace bearings at 300 hours, crank and bearings at 600 and motor at 900h but, if I remember correctly, a 912 is still significantly cheaper. The Spreadsheet model may have died with my old computer but I will see if I can dig it up.
User avatar
Relborg
Woohoo 100 posts - flying high
Woohoo 100 posts - flying high
Posts: 124
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 10:21 am
Location: Panorama
Contact:

Postby Relborg » Sat Oct 27, 2007 5:48 am

What is the TBO cost of a 582?
cosmin
Thinking of flying
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 7:21 am
Location: Suceava, Romania, or the sky

Postby cosmin » Sat Oct 27, 2007 9:01 am

Fly Line Revenge
User avatar
skybound®
Frequent Flyer
Frequent Flyer
Posts: 1223
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 12:51 pm
Location: Port Elizabeth

Postby skybound® » Sat Oct 27, 2007 10:47 am

Thanks Cosmin.

I didn't expect it to be that far over. We should update the 1997 model and even include some of the other motors that have emerged as being contenders in the last few years.

From the 1997 figures.
Cost of operating for 1200 hours is

582 $28,305
618 $30,230
912 $20,460
User avatar
Arnulf
Pilot in Command
Pilot in Command
Posts: 798
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 4:44 pm
Location: Windhoek / Omaruru

Postby Arnulf » Mon Oct 29, 2007 2:56 pm

skybound ® wrote:Thanks Cosmin.

I didn't expect it to be that far over. We should update the 1997 model and even include some of the other motors that have emerged as being contenders in the last few years.

From the 1997 figures.
Cost of operating for 1200 hours is

582 $28,305
618 $30,230
912 $20,460
Indeed. New up to date figures would be interesting. Also bear in mind that the TBO of the 912 has now been increased to 1500 hours. This makes the 912 even more attractive.

However when working out the costs, also bear in mind the annual utilization. Most microlights fly less than 50 hrs per year. So will the 1500 hr TBO be relevant? Who will fly his aerrie for 30 years? :shock:

Regards,
Arnulf
User avatar
skybound®
Frequent Flyer
Frequent Flyer
Posts: 1223
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 12:51 pm
Location: Port Elizabeth

Postby skybound® » Mon Oct 29, 2007 4:44 pm

Arnulf wrote:However when working out the costs, also bear in mind the annual utilization. Most microlights fly less than 50 hrs per year. So will the 1500 hr TBO be relevant? Who will fly his aerrie for 30 years? :shock:
The acceptable practice appears to be working out a cost per hour - providing for the major and other maintenance. Whether you actually reach it or not is not really taken into account. It is assumed somebody will have to pay for it at some point in time. :wink: :lol:

Will also find the value of an aircraft will be adjusted by the hours to go before overhaul, so indicrectly you will loose a portion at time of sale.
User avatar
Badger
Woohoo 100 posts - flying high
Woohoo 100 posts - flying high
Posts: 113
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 1:47 pm
Location: Farm "Stukkie Hemel" Dinokeng Game Reserve (25 21.229 S 28 24.457 E) & Saudi Arabia.

Running cost formula

Postby Badger » Tue Oct 30, 2007 12:24 pm

Gents
Do you have a formula available that one can use, preverably in Excel format to calculate the running costs of an aircraft.
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breaths away"
Savannah MXP740 VG

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests