This is one of the few research articles freely available:
http://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=69952 ... D201%2B286
It does come from the 40's, and it does refer to radial engines, but those were the most powerful piston engines ever produced...
They have a lot of good points about the ideal % of the circumference of the cylinder to seal, and such. But they also say the baffles must seal against the fins.
This is more contemporary, and covers a lot of the points you mentioned. It is also more VW specific:
http://home.hiwaay.net/~langford/faq/ch ... cool1.html
3. Shell baffles
Shell baffles ensure that the cooling air passes between the cooling fins on the cylinder walls and the cylinder heads. They cover the fourth side of small cooling passages, of roughly rectangular cross section. Shell baffles thus prevent 'dead water' areas where the local air flow between the cooling fins is either reduced or stagnant. Extensive deadwater areas may occur if the shells do not cover enough of the circumference of the cylinders. But if the shells cover too much of the circumference then unrealistically high pressure differentials would be required to create adequate rates of cooling airflow through the passages. Some engines benefit from an inter cylinder shell baffle which further reduces dead water areas.
It is extremely important that all the shell baffles actually make contact, throughout their length, with the edges of the cooling fins. Only then will the fins cool effectively to their full depth. Otherwise, the cooling air takes the easy way out along the unobstructed gaps.
There are many different designs of cylinder and cylinder head baffles - shell baffles stamped from a single sheet are possibly one of the best - but these can be incredibly expensive to buy and their manufacture requires facilities beyond the reach of most home-builders. It will pay to inspect as many other installations as you can in order to get good ideas.
This designer is fairly adamant that the baffles contact the fins. Although he is using aluminium, and not glass, the tiny relative proportion of fin area covered should make no difference.
OK - now these are a bunch of articles describing how, and why it should be done, BUT, just about every baffle I have seen has left a gap between the edge of the fin and the baffle... This worries me - what do they know that I don't know. I will be bugging one of my friends with a hydrodynamic simulator to run the problem, and see what the ideal solution is.