Hi all,
Just for fun: Some before & after pics.
The centre flap handle clearly shows how far forward the seating position has been moved. Next is to finish off the 2nd seat, make holes for the control sticks. Then I can cut away the forward turtle deck, cut open the firewall, move the rudder pedals forward and then start with widening the canopy.
When done I'll add the fuel tanks below the seats (hopefully standard off the shelve plastic fuel containers). Then I can start to concentrate on the engine installation. Slowly but surely my idea is coming together.
I just had an excellent weight saving idea to replace the wing walk area: I can mount a foldable aluminium step to the side of the fuselage just forward of the wing. Should be easy to make, have very little drag & be very light. With my seats being so far forward, this would be the ideal position to step onto to get inside the cockpit.
Henni wrote:This is my modest attempt at trying to achieve the following:
1. a KR2 that weighs less or same than the first one built by Kend Rand himself.
2. a KR2 that is roomier inside than any other built to date that I know of.
3. a KR2 that will stall below 40mph.
4. a KR2 that will be a full two seater & always be flown as such.
5. a KR2 that will have no cg issues.
6. a KR2 that will still fly at 120 to 130mph despite all of the above.
7. a KR2 that will easily operate from the same grass strips as most ultralights do.
To achieve the above from scratch might not be all that difficult. However, starting off with a pre-built stretched KR2 built mostly to plans requires just a tad more head scratching. Maybe this might be of value to some of you. Most opt for heavy with more power. I’m opting for the very extreme opposite
Quote wrote:Henni's goals with a 480 pound aircraft? Maybe the drug reference was correct.
A 480 pound aircraft with a minimum 490 pound payload (two 200 pound people and 15 gallon of fuel) that stalls at less than 40 mph and cruises at 120 to 130 mph? Seems like a real engineering challenge to me. If Henni can pull this off he's a better engineer than those that have come before him...
There are some laws of physics you will have to sneak around or crawl over. More passenger room means more airplane which means more weight. Small field operation means more power or more wing which means more weight. Stall below 40 mph = more wing = more weight. Two up with no CG problems on such a small aircraft will be tricky. High cruise speed with more wing and low horsepower (to accomplish the above) will be a challenge.
Just for the record: The MCR4 lifts four fully grown adults from an ordinary sized runway using only 100hp. And the cruise speed is not that shabby either. Talk about an engineering feat!!! And of thinking outside of the box and far above the norm... Some strive on: "It cannot be achieved!"
For whatever it's worth, I've gained close to 100lbs just by my engine choice alone! The rest of the airframe is built very light. The canopy windows will be made from lightweight lexan with a centre piece down the middle front to help with the wind pressure. I'll start weighing everything soon with the engine on the seats and then post the figures over here. It should give a rough indication of where I'm headed.
Herewith some interesting info:
Engine HP Weight(lbs) Comments
Cuynia 460F-35 35 66
Rotax 503 ` 50 85
Great Plains VW 1600CC 55 160
Hirth F23-EP2 60 70
Jabira 60 119
PZL 2A-120 60 129
Rotax 582 63 95 Includes 20 lbs radiator, etc.
Continental A-65 65 173
Limbach L 1800 66 154
Limbach L 1700 66 161
Rotax 618 74 136 Includes 20 lbs radiator, etc.
Great Plains VW 2180CC 75 165
Franklin 225 75 230
Limbach L 2000 80 155
Rotax 912 80 165 Includes 20 lbs radiator, et
Continental C-85 85 207
Limbach L 2400 94 181
Continental C-90 95 207
Great Plains VW 2600CC 96 190
Stratus Subaru EA-81 100 205
Continental O-200 100 220
CAM-100 100 225 Includes 20 lbs radiator, etc
Formula Power C100 104 210
Rotax 914 115 155
Lycoming O-235 115 215
PZL 4A-235 116 226
Hirth F30-FP24 120 101
Continental IO-240 125 250
Continental O-300 145 277
Lycoming O-320-A 150 243
Lycoming O-320-D 160 253
Franklin 335 165 320
Formula Power F170 174 270
Lycoming O-360-A 180 265
Lycoming IO-360-A 200 293
NW Aero Ford V6 200 415
PZL 6A-350 205 330
Continental IO-360 210 350
NW Aero Chevy V6 230 420
Lycoming O-540-B 235 366
Lyoming O-540-E 260 368
Formula Power F260 274 390
Lycoming IO-540-K 300 443
Continental IO-520 300 459
Lycoming IO-720 400 568
Certified Engine
O-200-A 100 190
O-200-B 100 190
O-300-A 145 268
O-300-E 145 268
IO-346 165 297
IO-360-B 210 327
TSIO-360- 210 334
O-470-J 225 381
O-470-R 230 438
O-470-13 235 414
O-470-15 190 405
IO-470-C 250 432
IO-470-D 260 426
IO-470-E 260 461
IO-470-F 260 464
IO-470-V 260 472
TSIO-470-D 260 511
IO-520-L 285 466
O-200-A 100 190
O-200-B 100 220
O-300-A 145 268
O-300-E 145 268
IO-346 165 297
IO-360-B 210 327
TSIO-360-A 210 334
O-470-J 225 381
O-470-R 230 438
O-470-13 225 414
O-470-15 190 405
IO-470-C 250 432
IO-470-D 260 426
IO-470-E 260 461
IO-470-F 260 464
IO-470-V 260 472
TSIO-470-D 260 511
IO-520-L 285 466
O-235-C1B 115 240
I also emphasize again that VG's have
proven to reduce the stall speed by 8 to 10mph. Yes, there is a definite penalty to the cruising speed, I know! If I gain only 5mph, I can make her stall below 40mph. I do not think that my goals are unachievable! I say again, if I'm over optimistic, it won't be by too wide a margin.
As for the cruise speed: Well, if I make only 100 to 110mph instead of 120 to 130mph, no big deal. It will still be way faster than most other microlights using the same engine. Most others cruise around 80mph or so.
Ken Rand managed 150mph on 60hp. Something to keep in mind & consider. As far as I know his could carry two occupants. Rudi's managed a recorded & documented 180mph plus over a 500km course on a modified VW engine. Troy manages 230mph straight and level on 100hp.
This builder did not specifically build or design for speed, yet see what he achieved on a similar engine that I'm using. Most of the above are all there on the KRNet. After all, the tiny & very light little Rotax can also make 64 horses at sea level, same as many VWs!
In any case, this is one of my dreams for now. At least it occupies my attention and gives me something to strive for. Nice to have some extra ordinary challenges to try & overcome. Keeps my brain young and active. Nothing repetitious or boring about any of it...
Keep well all,
Henni