After Muffler

Technical questions, advice, sharing information etc (aircraft, engines, instruments, weather and such)
User avatar
Cloud Warrior
Top Gun
Top Gun
Posts: 558
Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 9:49 am
Location: Perth, Western Australia

After Muffler

Postby Cloud Warrior » Mon Mar 15, 2010 2:25 am

Need some advice please. I am looking at shedding any unnecessary weight on my trike. I currently have an after muffler fitted to the exhaust. It was already on the trike when I bought it second hand. Pieter De Necker once told me in passing getting rid of it would give me another 2-3HP. Has anybody removed their's in the past? Was there a significant difference in performance? How much noisier is the aircraft without it?

Thanks

Sebastian
Solowings Aquilla
32-4817
White Gum Farm, Western Australia
User avatar
Wargames
Frequent Flyer
Frequent Flyer
Posts: 1353
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2008 2:00 pm
Location: Morningstar, Cape Town

Re: After Muffler

Postby Wargames » Mon Mar 15, 2010 7:59 am

I did remove mine. But the sound and performance difference is only in the books. I didn't notice anything, so I did put it back on. It was on recommendation that the hot gasses don't blow strait on the prop which is a pvc compound. With pprop, you wont have that issue. Try it out, you have nothing to lose.
The Naked Trike
ZU-AVL
"I hate CIRCLIPS!!"
User avatar
Cacofonix
I hate turbulence
I hate turbulence
Posts: 349
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 5:37 pm
Location: Pretoria

Re: After Muffler

Postby Cacofonix » Sat Mar 27, 2010 5:07 pm

I attended a 1st line service and maintenance cource with Rotax in Feb 2010 and it was said that it just makes for a smoother engine...less vibrating
Man small...why fall?..Skies call...that's all.
ZU-EJU
User avatar
Morph
The Big Four K
The Big Four K
Posts: 5176
Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 3:34 pm
Location: Cape Town

Re: After Muffler

Postby Morph » Sun Mar 28, 2010 6:00 pm

take it off, throw it away. it has only one purpose, a quieter engine for those noise abatement environments
Greg Perkins
Loco
Frequent Flyer
Frequent Flyer
Posts: 1097
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 7:53 pm
Location: Crosswinds
Contact:

Re: After Muffler

Postby Loco » Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:16 am

I'm also torn between taking mine off...

Pros:
- Less noise
- No hot exhaust gasses directly on prop

Cons:
- Less HP (anybody managed to dyna theirs to prove/disprove this)
- More weight

I'm leaning towards the KISS principle & just chuck the thing + one of the most experienced aviators advised me to do so as well...

Eish!?
Anthony Hugo

Crosswinds
Proud member of The Chain Gang
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=18311
http://www.facebook.com/groups/574736389205283/
User avatar
nicow
The Big Four K
The Big Four K
Posts: 5055
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 7:09 am
Location: Mooketsi,Duiwelskloof
Contact:

Re: After Muffler

Postby nicow » Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:31 am

Mine is also off...
Nico
Limpopo Flight School
nico@limpopoflightschool.co.za
ger koff
Thinking of flying
Posts: 14
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2010 9:14 am

Re: After Muffler

Postby ger koff » Fri Jun 15, 2012 11:40 am

Those mufflers usually have fibreglass packing which is the sound absorbing material. The oil residue in the exhaust gas contaminates the fibreglass pretty quickly and it loses its ability to muffle the noise, in which case it is only adding additional weight. The fibreglass packing needs to replaced quite often to be effective. This means that the muffler needs to be able to be opened and not of the rolled closed type.
As far as the reduced EGT is concerned, has anyone actually measured it before and after the muffler? I suspect not.
The EGT after may not be significantly different after the muffler, particularly if it's clogged up.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests