BAD NAV wrote:Niren
Good to see you on the forum...
Help me here please... The operators manual states that the 582 Blue top burns fuel at 20.5 litres / hour..... in cruise ! Is this correct?
I have a Cheetah and fly at 5800rpm as I was taught. The operators manual says 6000rpm.... Now what is it to be?
I have a E-type gearbox with a 3.47:1 reduction. This means the prop only spins at 1600rpm at 5800rpm. That's slow!
Bad Nav
This all depends on the prop. The 582 motor will run up to 6800rpm. The Rotax manual will give you fuel consumption based on many assumptions, i.e. altitude, aircraft, prop pitch etc etc. It cannot tell you specifics about your plane. Factors that govern the fuel consupmtion are, load, drag, wing design, speed, propeller pitch, altitude, density altitude, i.e. temperatures, air pressures etc etc.
Assuming you are happy with the plane, then except for flying lighter, i.e. kick the pax out, or reducing drag by adding fairings etc the only thing you do have control over is the prop (if it's ground adjustable of course).
Here you can pitch it lower, giving you a higher static rpm (don't exceed the 6800). This is great for takeoff and climbing. Unfortunately you will then have to run at a higher RPM to maintain straight and level flight. so higher fuel consumption.
Alternatively you pitch it higher, reducing the static rpm, this will reduce you climb ability but it will also reduce the rpm at cruise, improving the fuel consumption. It won't really give you better speed as this is governed more by the wing design than the prop pitch.
The absolute ideal of course is to have an in-flight adjustable prop. This you set for low pitch at take off and during climbing and then once at cruising altitude, increase the pitch to improve the economy rate. Unfortunately these are damned expensive.
I had a 503 in my old Challenger and I had the static set to 6150, i.e. max rpm at takeoff. The climb was not the best but at 5400 I would be at best cruise speed of 75mph and burning 14l/h. At 4800rpm I would be flying at 60mph and burning 10l/h . However you are flying in a nose high attitude which was not comfortable. if I increased to 5800 then fuel consumption would be at 16l/h but then you could not trim her for straight and level and she would just want to climb. You would have to push and hold the stick forward to try to increase speed and maintain straight and level. I would add a miniumum of 2 l/h at each rpm on to these figures if I had a 582 on the plane. (NOTE: the Challenger is a sleek tandem 2-seater so the drag is significantly lower then that of a side by side like the Cheetah. Expect higher consumption because of this.) The 582 wouldn't give me more speed just better climbing ability.
Wrt the gearbox and prop speed. The most important thing to remmember is that the prop tip must not exceed the speed of sound. This will cause vibrations and the prop to fail. The length of the prop is critical here. The longer it is the faster the tip will be moving for the same rpm. Remmember the box ratio is a step down. So, a lower ratio box turns the prop faster than a higher ratio box. This means lower ratio boxes are limited to shorter fatter props vs longer thinner ones on the higher ratio box.