crankshaft hours ???

Matters of general interest
User avatar
Leprachaun
Frequent Flyer
Frequent Flyer
Posts: 1161
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 12:57 pm
Location: Pretoria

crankshaft hours ???

Postby Leprachaun » Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:21 pm

Hi Guys I am busy with a survey on crankshaft hours ,
please submit your hours as it will remain confidential - I want to supply stats to CAA as to how many hours the average crank has done as well as engine type
As example my plane a rebuilt engine - 582 -no new crank -removed the engine and replaced it at 1632 hours I flew it 250 hours
other 582 ex cheetah Rhino Park - 900 hours - every 300 hour inspection
no failures .
Leprachaun
A pilot lives by perfection , or not at all!
User avatar
RV4ker (RIP)
The Big Four K
The Big Four K
Posts: 5386
Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 7:48 pm
Location: The Coves & FAVB

Postby RV4ker (RIP) » Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:25 pm

Lep
Sorry for HiJack :oops: :oops: :oops:

What is situation with crank hrs today. If you have flown more than the suggested 150/300 hrs are you legal if you continue to fly?
4 Sale (will trade)
P166S, Jodel, hangar and other odds and sods
Radial - http://tiny.cc/eppqp
Still @ The Coves (Harties) but dream has died
User avatar
Leprachaun
Frequent Flyer
Frequent Flyer
Posts: 1161
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 12:57 pm
Location: Pretoria

Postby Leprachaun » Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:50 pm

As the law stands your crank has to be replaced at 300 hours !
I have been in touch with the powers to be plus the new inspectors who are still pretty lenient on the issue , but we need stats to "soften" them a bit .
They are adament that training aircraft will abide by the rules and others may get by with a crank inspection -
Now you know why I need some ammo , Leprachaun
A pilot lives by perfection , or not at all!
User avatar
Morph
The Big Four K
The Big Four K
Posts: 5176
Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 3:34 pm
Location: Cape Town

Postby Morph » Tue Jan 08, 2008 3:00 pm

My 503 in my old plane ZU-AUK did 575 hours by the time I sold it. Just before then (534hours) I did a crank test and the crank was within specification as were the pistons and rings. (wear limit on the gap is set to 1.0mm, mine was at 0.4mm after 534hours)

On average 503's in the Western Cape have been pushing 1000 to 1200 hours before replacement. But I don't have specifics

ZU-WYG (Challenger 503) is over 700 hours on the crank and still within specification
Greg Perkins
User avatar
Morph
The Big Four K
The Big Four K
Posts: 5176
Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 3:34 pm
Location: Cape Town

Postby Morph » Tue Jan 08, 2008 3:22 pm

In the last 3 years in the Western Cape I have not heard of a single crank failure on a 503 or a 582.

Ask aviation engines to give you some stats regarding the sales of cranks vs the amount of motors they have sold over the last 10 years
Last edited by Morph on Tue Jan 08, 2008 3:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Greg Perkins
User avatar
Skimmer
Ready for the first flight
Posts: 44
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 3:55 pm
Location: ERMF - Bapfontein

Postby Skimmer » Tue Jan 08, 2008 3:24 pm

Good luck on your quest Sir Leprechaun. "To measure is to know" (Lord Kelvin, 19th-century mathematical physicist.)

Lets get as much data as possible - our instructor fraternity should be able to contribute lots of history & will be an excellent source of stats. Also important will be to find out the consequences of the failures: safe landing, damage,injuries or death.

You have probably got them all but I would suggest analysing the data by A/C Type [Trike, Fixed Wing], Usage [Training, Social], Hours/year, Location [Coastal, Inland-High, Inland-Low], Oiling method [premix, injection], Decoke history, in addition to details of the failure.

While we are busy with this how about including data on engine outs and the reasons if known. A PM is on its way with my details.
Think of what the Wright brothers could have done with a Rotax!
User avatar
Gadget
I hate turbulence
I hate turbulence
Posts: 328
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 7:52 am
Location: Somewhere where the wind is blowing

Postby Gadget » Tue Jan 08, 2008 3:30 pm

503 DCDI = 600 hours and tests perfect. Never been opened. Also havent heard of any crank failures in the last three years.
User avatar
Hot Stuff
Survived first engine out
Survived first engine out
Posts: 266
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:37 pm

CRANK HOURS

Postby Hot Stuff » Tue Jan 08, 2008 4:09 pm

503 DCDI done 650hrs inspection 120 hours ago on crank and was within specs
User avatar
nicow
The Big Four K
The Big Four K
Posts: 4958
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 7:09 am
Location: Potgietersrus
Contact:

Postby nicow » Tue Jan 08, 2008 6:00 pm

My old 503 single ignition had 880 hours with the same crank.
The other trike had a 503 duel motor with 815 hours with the same crank.
My 582 is now on 280 hours...
Nico
Limpopo Flight School
vliegskool@hotmail.com
ZU-AWA
ZU-DMM
ZU-AJO
ZU-AWF
ZU-BAI
ZS-WOR
ZU-TCT
ZU-DOD
ZU-CIE
ZU-BIW
User avatar
lefssa
Solo cross country
Solo cross country
Posts: 131
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 10:25 am
Location: Hoedspruit
Contact:

crankshaft hours

Postby lefssa » Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:16 pm

My 503 did 750 hours never opened till now. All the bits were well within spec. My last trike also 503 did about 600 hours. no problem with crank.
Lone Ranger
Ready for the first flight
Posts: 46
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Springs

Postby Lone Ranger » Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:36 pm

my 503 Hornet had 680 hrs when i sold it , the new owner wanted me to get it checked, opened at aviation engines no problems found !!!!
User avatar
KFA
Toooooo Thousand
Toooooo Thousand
Posts: 2789
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 8:09 pm
Location: Now at Petit (FARA)
Contact:

Postby KFA » Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:38 pm

503 - 600 plus hours and still going strong
Luck-The moment when preparation meets opportunity.
"Whether you think you can or you think you can't, you're right." -Henry Ford
"Opportunity Is Missed By Most Because It Is Dressed in Overalls and Looks Like Work." - Thomas Alva Edison
BUSHPILOTS FLY TAILDRAGGERS
Failure is not the opposite of success, it is the stepping stone for success
User avatar
lamercyfly
Top Gun
Top Gun
Posts: 592
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 7:56 am
Location: Durban
Contact:

Postby lamercyfly » Tue Jan 08, 2008 9:22 pm

I cannot remember specifics, but the following is a true refelction of the facts at La Mercy Flight Park:

1. The school owned and operated about 10 microlight trikes, all fitted with Rotax 503 motors, during the 8 years of operation. All these machines did more than 600 hours per engine, with only 2 dekoke's done in those periods per engine. All trikes sold, and still flying today. One trike was fitted with a Rotax 582. This machine had a new crank fitted at 180 hours, and then did over 450 hours thereafter before it was sold. One particular 503 engine did 1 300 hours before we fitted a new shortblock. The original crank was still just fine.

2. All owners of trikes at La Mercy, and there were as many as 30+, never had crank failures of any kind. These privately owned trikes had engines with hours ranging from 100 to 1000. I sold them to almost all their owners, and was solely responsible for all AP work and maintenance.

3. In total the hours put onto these privately owned trikes, plus the school owned trikes, was approximately 16 000hours over the 8 year period.

4. All engine failures which occured, were as a result of non-crank related issues. These were as follows:

4.1 Water related problems on 582's
(a) Radiator cap came off
(b) insufficient water in radiator
(c) Thermostat failure
(d) radiator cap seal broken
(e) oil in water from rotary shaft, causing frothing of water and subsequent loss of cooling function causing overheating
(f) loss of circulation in old radiator

4.2 Rotary shaft seal related problems
4.3 Cold seizure on numerous occasions

4.4 fuel related problems
(a) water contamination
(b) blocked filter
(c) running out of fuel
(d) carb icing
(e) abrasion of fuel hose, causing loss of fuel flow


all the above led to engine failure in flight

No fatalities, nor even serious injuries occurred to any passengers or pilots of the aircraft engine failure mentioned above.

4.5 electrical failure
electrical failures did not cause emergency landings, as full operational functionality was maintained on remaining ignition circuit.

I trust the above will help you Alex.

Thanks and good luck.

Please note that I am NOT in favour of an AMENDED maintenance schedule, as that will always be a a contentious issue. I want any reference to a maintenance schedule as compulsory to be scrapped, and maintencance as the discretion of the owner and service industry.

Kind regards.
David Daniel
Email: lamercyfly@gmail.com
Mobile: +27 (0)746495744
User avatar
MADDOG
Almost a pilot
Almost a pilot
Posts: 166
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Springs - Far from C

Postby MADDOG » Wed Jan 09, 2008 8:46 am

I want any reference to a maintenance schedule as compulsory to be scrapped, and maintencance as the discretion of the owner and service industry. Hear Hear!

Rotax 618 250 hours no problems at all. Never been opened. NOT for sale!
Aquilla the Hun
User avatar
Dreamer
Look I'm flying
Look I'm flying
Posts: 224
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 10:02 am
Location: JHB

Postby Dreamer » Wed Jan 09, 2008 9:02 am

582 inspected at 470 hrs and still in spec.
A new resident at Microland
If the runway is wider than it is long, rethink your circuit.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 198 guests