Page 1 of 3

Certain avcom subcribers are having a go at us again

Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 11:29 pm
by Morph
Check out this lot,

Without any form of motivation, certain idiots from avcom are having a go at us again
kevinbark wrote:With the scattering of microlights all over the uncontrolled countryside, who is going to police okes from doing stupid stuff? Should anyone be stopping these rocket scientists from erasing themselves from the gene pool, I say NO.
kevinbark wrote:and thus I say : LET THEM.....aviation gets rid of those with no respect. Collateral damage - part of the game
pirate wrote:I do not think MPL training standards (i.e. those defined by the law) are sufficient at all
Why is it that these guys continually feel it necessary to pick on us?

Hey we are better than these miscreants. We know we can fly, we don't have to prove it to anyone

More here

http://www.avcom.co.za/phpBB2/viewtopic ... highlight=

Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 7:21 am
by The Agent
Morph there are cowboys in all catogories of flying but we only hear or read of them after an incident.

Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 7:50 am
by Tumbleweed
I think, typical,

Avcom seems to be personality driven. Pity, coz an excellent forum is being dominated by a handfull ego - maniacs.

The purpose of information sharing and on-going training seems to be highjacked at any chance to stamp authority with antagonism and insults.

Seems to come mostly from a handfull of under- employed com pilots and wanna- be supposedly 'hire 'n fly' low milers hiding behind glamorous jet fighter avatars.

I'd appreciate any 'correction' offered to me for any unknown 'offences' but if presented in the same sarcastic belittling manner would be responded with a traditional 'snot klap'.

Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 7:53 am
by priester
Morph

Avcom does not have subscribers.

It does have a number of members who believe they know all and believe they are somehow better than others, and never make a mistake.

Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 8:17 am
by Biggles
:lol:

I have been following that thread with great enjoyment.

Avcom while it certainly does have many an informative discussion it tends to degenerate to name calling and gross generalization whenever microlights are mentioned by a few people. But Avcom has a large member base and you are bound to attract several a$%# holes.

I firmly believe that this mainly due to jealousy and indignation that they have to pay huge amounts of money to get and stay aloft. And as such they think that they have exclusive rights to the air.

But it is a small group of aviators that feel this way aswell, so lets not brand the whole of Avcom.

Real pilots love flying.

Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 11:06 am
by Dreamer
Hey Priester, nice to see you on here.......always enjoy watching you rock the boat on avcom. :lol:

Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 11:08 am
by DarkHelmet
DarkHelmet sits back and watches with Elizabeth.

Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 11:09 am
by Dreamer
Even a heli accident has to get microlights mentioned, at least we know they think about us a lot... :lol:

Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 11:19 am
by The Agent
I am now really worried with the arrival of Priester. :shock:

Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 11:48 am
by Bacchus
Funny how people think they are more important than you when they have bigger toys.
Children are exactely the same.
I certainly would never look down on paragliders, hot air ballons ( just because they are slower) etc.

Like they say... you get the super arseholes everywhere.
That poor poepol must be very carefull, he is so CLEVER that his brain might explode. Then he will be out of the gene pool too......And DAMN, how will i be able to live without clever people like that. Cant bear the thought! If he is not there anymore, who will help us to understand aviation? Scary....VERY scary.......

Re: Certain avcom subcribers are having a go at us again

Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 12:14 pm
by Bennie Vorster
kevinbark wrote:With the scattering of microlights all over the uncontrolled countryside, who is going to police okes from doing stupid stuff? Should anyone be stopping these rocket scientists from erasing themselves from the gene pool, I say NO.
kevinbark wrote:and thus I say : LET THEM.....aviation gets rid of those with no respect. Collateral damage - part of the game
pirate wrote:I do not think MPL training standards (i.e. those defined by the law) are sufficient at all
($$) ($$) ($$) ($$) ($$) Not worth the discussion. It's a waste of precise time and energy. xxx ':-

Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 2:10 pm
by swiftprop
:shock: When you have a group of people in a club, town, buiness or any other large gatehering you will probably find that most are honest, nice people. Never think that because some apples in a barrel are rotten that all are rotten. Generalisations are unwise. Many flyers of blik aries are avid flyers of micros as well...

Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 2:13 pm
by swiftprop
Sorry about my spelling in the above reply. Will use diksunarie nekst time

Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 7:56 pm
by priester
The Agent wrote:I am now really worried with the arrival of Priester. :shock:
Now why would that be, my dear friend? :oops:

Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 9:32 am
by Boeing
Morph, the problem is guys who bad mouth other people iether hide behind a nick name on the forum or behind forty of his buddies when confronted face to face, simply because they dont have the ballitjies to say these things when face to face with whoever it is they are talking about!

I fully agree with demon, these clowns dont even consitute 1% of the avcom forum! These guys in question are a bunch kids on the avcom forum who obviously dont have anything more Intellectual to discuss amoung each other!


Just ignor these dicks.... all they want is for us to retaliate! lets not give them a kick out of it, unless its something serious coming from someone who knows what they are talking about! To these guys guys on avcom:

shame, jammer om van jou kak te hoor!