Page 1 of 1

Thunderbird mk iv vs mk ii

Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 6:07 pm
by Kalahari pilot
What is the difference between the 2 crafts?

Is it only the powerplant that differs or are there other differences? Except for instumentation?

New to flying so would appreciate your help.

Re: Thunderbird mk iv vs mk ii

Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2017 8:38 pm
by Le Pou
Hi Kalahari Pilot,
Speak to Trevor Davies at 082 four42 three925, he designed and built them (Davies Aircraft Corporation). Also look at his website http://www.tde.co.za

Re: Thunderbird mk iv vs mk ii

Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 5:40 pm
by Kalahari pilot
Thanks Le Pou

Will give him a call.

Re: Thunderbird mk iv vs mk ii

Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 6:56 pm
by Luan
When you get the info please report back here... I am also interested in knowing. When asking around about a thunderbird the first thing that is said is "drag-bucket". But that does not say anything, what is the glide ratio? The thunderbird looks a lot like the bantam to me, from the pictures anyways, and I once saw a video from aunty Sue gliding a bantam that was quite impressive.

Re: Thunderbird mk iv vs mk ii

Posted: Fri Aug 18, 2017 8:01 pm
by Kalahari pilot
Hi all

Ive calles with no answer and texted with no answer.
The website is also unknown.404

So no info available.

Re: Thunderbird mk iv vs mk ii

Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2017 11:10 am
by Le Pou
Hi Kalahari Pilot
That is the correct phone number I gave you for Trevor (0824423925), I spoke to him this morning and he told me that the differences go beyond just the engine change. The MK IV has the 912 engine but you need to speak to him yourself to get the detail.
Apparently the MKII and the MKV are the same aircraft except for the engines, both 2-strokes. The MKIV and MKVI have 4-stroke engines and required modifications to the structure.

Re: Thunderbird mk iv vs mk ii

Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2017 12:27 pm
by Kalahari pilot
Thanx for the reply..

Re: Thunderbird mk iv vs mk ii

Posted: Tue Aug 22, 2017 2:43 pm
by JJJ
The 912 is a heavier engine therefor it has a longer tail boom. The engine is also mounted closer to the wings. in other words the boom is shorter in front.

Re: Thunderbird mk iv vs mk ii

Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2017 6:42 am
by Blue Max
There is a lot to be said about the Thunderbird.!
Perhaps you should rather get the opinion of those who has flown them for a number of hours.
THEY will be the best reference.
My personal opinion is based on only 80 hrs.

Re: Thunderbird mk iv vs mk ii

Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2017 8:33 pm
by Scorpio
`n damn lekker aerie...jy moet net nie haastig wees. hy vlieg vanself, jy moet net die throttle handle.. :lol:
i have one, also flies my friend`s. sal hom nooit verkoop nie!

Re: Thunderbird mk iv vs mk ii

Posted: Thu Aug 31, 2017 5:55 am
by Luan
Dis nice om te hoor van mense wat weet. Wat is die cruise spoed? Hoe klim hy met n' 582 in gauteng op MAUW? My vriend wou een koop met n' 618, en hy is redelik skraal, met die toets vlug kon hulle nie mooi die bome aan die einde van die runway oor kom nie.

Re: Thunderbird mk iv vs mk ii

Posted: Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:12 am
by Scorpio
Met `n 618 net lekkerder! Myne het `n 582, ek weeg 115kg en my buddie so 105kg.
Ons runway is 2800ft asl en hy sukkel nie baie om op te kom, so 100m rol om die krag drade op die einde te clear.
Wens myne was `n 618 :mrgreen: