GPS question
- RV4ker (RIP)
- The Big Four K
- Posts: 5386
- Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 7:48 pm
- Location: The Coves & FAVB
GPS question
Can you attach 2 GPS to same antenna?
4 Sale (will trade)
P166S, Jodel, hangar and other odds and sods
Radial - http://tiny.cc/eppqp
Still @ The Coves (Harties) but dream has died
P166S, Jodel, hangar and other odds and sods
Radial - http://tiny.cc/eppqp
Still @ The Coves (Harties) but dream has died
- Rudix
- The Boss
- Posts: 1653
- Joined: Sun May 07, 2006 8:04 pm
- Location: Pretoria - Rhino Park
- Contact:
Re: GPS question
Yes it will work, you might get a slight loss of signal strength, but that would only be noticeable under marginal conditions. One thing to remember is that you are creating a single point of failure for both GPS's...RV4ker wrote:Can you attach 2 GPS to same antenna?
The loss of signal strength would be caused by splitting the signal (thus effectively giving each receiver 50% of the signal, a 3db drop in signal) and the additional cable and splitter in the link that will cause a slight loss.
Fly safe,
Rudi
"Never be afraid to try something new. Remember that a lone amateur built the Ark. A large group of professionals built the Titanic." 

- RV4ker (RIP)
- The Big Four K
- Posts: 5386
- Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 7:48 pm
- Location: The Coves & FAVB
Re: GPS question
Thanks
The GPS's are nice to have and to stay out of controlled spaces when flying around JHB mostly. I use the 296 and it is u p to date while the KLX 135 is old, small and not u to date, but it is also my radio so I keep it as backup. When I am bored I spends hrs watching the lag of the KLX vs the Garmin. Sometimes in as much as 5kts...
, but removing it and redoing the panels is not yet a necessity and it all works so I just want to tidy it up a bit... I have a KLX135 and a 296 and I am gatvol of the tangeled 296 cable and the sucker mount that keeps falling off. I don;t want to make more holes in the skin for another antenna, so I happy with 50% drop. The cable is <2m long and I tested in the hangar and it seems to work ok?
The GPS's are nice to have and to stay out of controlled spaces when flying around JHB mostly. I use the 296 and it is u p to date while the KLX 135 is old, small and not u to date, but it is also my radio so I keep it as backup. When I am bored I spends hrs watching the lag of the KLX vs the Garmin. Sometimes in as much as 5kts...



4 Sale (will trade)
P166S, Jodel, hangar and other odds and sods
Radial - http://tiny.cc/eppqp
Still @ The Coves (Harties) but dream has died
P166S, Jodel, hangar and other odds and sods
Radial - http://tiny.cc/eppqp
Still @ The Coves (Harties) but dream has died
- Rudix
- The Boss
- Posts: 1653
- Joined: Sun May 07, 2006 8:04 pm
- Location: Pretoria - Rhino Park
- Contact:
Re: GPS question
RV4ker wrote:Thanks
The GPS's are nice to have and to stay out of controlled spaces when flying around JHB mostly. I use the 296 and it is u p to date while the KLX 135 is old, small and not u to date, but it is also my radio so I keep it as backup. When I am bored I spends hrs watching the lag of the KLX vs the Garmin. Sometimes in as much as 5kts...![]()
![]()
, but removing it and redoing the panels is not yet a necessity and it all works so I just want to tidy it up a bit... I have a KLX135 and a 296 and I am gatvol of the tangeled 296 cable and the sucker mount that keeps falling off. I don;t want to make more holes in the skin for another antenna, so I happy with 50% drop. The cable is <2m long and I tested in the hangar and it seems to work ok?
Sounds like a good plan!
Unless the signals on all sats are VERY weak you won't even notice the 50% drop, I am often amazed how well GPS's work even with their small antennas mostly obscured. If it works in the hangar it will work well in the air

"Never be afraid to try something new. Remember that a lone amateur built the Ark. A large group of professionals built the Titanic." 

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests