Intensive evaluation of two popular 2 place planes.

Matters of general interest
User avatar
pierre
Going for flight test
Going for flight test
Posts: 180
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 11:09 am
Location: Port Elizabeth

Intensive evaluation of two popular 2 place planes.

Postby pierre » Sun Sep 06, 2009 9:36 am

Intensive evaluation of two popular 2 place planes.
2 Place Comparison - Challenger 2 versus CF-18B
You decide which aircraft best suits your needs and budget!
Comparison Feature

..................... Quad City Challenger 2*..... Boeing CF-18B Hornet

Crew ...............1 or 2..............................1 or 2
Seating.............Tandem.........................Tandem
Empty Weight......450 lbs.........................23,000 lbs
Max Weight........960 lbs..........................51,550 lbs
Length.............. 20 ft .......................... 56 ft
Wingspan........... 29.5 ft..........................40 ft
Wing Area...........66 sq ft........................400 sq ft
Max Speed...........100 mph......................1127 mph
Max Altitude........14,000 ft......................50,000 ft
Climb Rate..........800 - 1200 fpm...............50,000 fpm
Powerplant..........1 Rotax 503 or 582...........2x GE F404 Turbofans
Undercarriage.......Fixed, Tricycle...............Retractable, Tricycle
Optional Skis...........Yes.............................No
Optional Floats.........Yes.............................No**
Unit Cost...............R 250 000....................$35 million
Operating cost.........R120 / hour***..............R40,000 / hour
Armament Pilot's tongue and sharp wit Various missiles, bombs, 20mm cannon


**CF-18B is available for service on water but requires purchase of Nimitz class aircraft carrier. Sold separately. Not available in South Africa

Conclusion:
It is clear from the above comparison that the Challenger is the winner if budget is your primary concern.
(It is true what they say about retractables, they really do cost a lot more to maintain!)
The CF18 certainly has the wow factor going for it, if you really want to impress your friends.
But if that just is just too far above your cost range, maybe the Challenger with a 582 will suffice.
Attachments
chal.jpeg
chal.jpeg (35.61 KiB) Viewed 1361 times
BlueAngelsFA18.jpg
BlueAngelsFA18.jpg (40.31 KiB) Viewed 1361 times
User avatar
John Young
The Boss
The Boss
Posts: 1973
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 8:38 am
Location: Jacksonville, Florida, USA

Intensive evaluation of two popular 2 place planes.

Postby John Young » Sun Sep 06, 2009 3:00 pm

:shock:

Unusual tail wheel for a Challenger.

Regards
John ZU-sEXY

PS: Wind has died down - going for another flight - cheers.
Attachments
chal.jpeg
chal.jpeg (8.92 KiB) Viewed 1309 times
Was a sEXY trike. Now registered as N457YJ
User avatar
Jimbo
Learning to fly
Learning to fly
Posts: 61
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 4:31 pm

Re: Intensive evaluation of two popular 2 place planes.

Postby Jimbo » Sun Sep 06, 2009 5:17 pm

I was going to get one of those Boeings, till I saw the price of parts.
User avatar
Brian
Got my wings at last
Got my wings at last
Posts: 226
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 8:24 pm

Re: Intensive evaluation of two popular 2 place planes.

Postby Brian » Sun Sep 06, 2009 9:06 pm

Ek moet se jou somme maak sin en ek dink die Challenger gaan op die einde van die dag baie meer ekonomies wees (**) tensy jy daardie Nimitz vir n bargain kan optel. It is a buyers market at the moment after all :lol: :lol: :lol:

Wanneer maiden julle die aerie Pierre?
User avatar
pierre
Going for flight test
Going for flight test
Posts: 180
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 11:09 am
Location: Port Elizabeth

Re: Intensive evaluation of two popular 2 place planes.

Postby pierre » Mon Sep 07, 2009 12:07 pm

HeHe Max 2Weke

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests