I posted this on AVCOM:
"Very glad to see that many 'conventional' pilots speak up in favour of us Microlighters. I fly both PPL and MPL types and agree with the general trend stated here; the culprits will most likely have been monkeys whether they flew PPL, MPL or HPL types- its the person type rather than the aircraft type.
Coming from a PPL background I have noticed that small slow aircraft pilots tend not to talk very often; perhaps because they tend to fly 'about the patch' or because they do not cover much ground... "Aircraft X at position Y" ... 5 mins later.... "aircraft X at position Y+1km". I think that the latter is big part of the reason and this is something that we as microlighters need to highlight in our community (radio calls should be timed every few minutes rather than be triggered by a new position, which may take many more minutes). As has been pointed out closing speeds of faster aircraft can put the microlighter (and the other aircraft) in dangerous proximity in that silence between calls - which is why (as has also been mentioned) microlight trikes like to fly as low as possible in an effort to be below the fast traffic.
Coming back to my original point though; PPL types also do not talk every 2 minutes to report and they cover ground a lot quicker.
I think that the point is that, in high traffic areas, you simply have to be very awake- unless you have real time constant positioning and tracking systems on all aircraft this will always be a problem."
I think that it is true that slow aircraft need to provide position reports triggered by time lapse rather than by landmark; I try to do this and it has saved me once or twice. As for those guys, of whatever make, that "will listen for others" ....
Oddball
A lone impulse of delight drove to this tumult in the skies...