

Why?
Harsh words indeed. See my post on Avcom. The members that posted on the Avcom thread were complaining about the fact that the members of this site were canvassed. The first I knew of the problem of non-Avcom members voting was in Chris's reply to my post. I agree that is not on. I however see no problem with people canvassing votes.skybound ® wrote:Guys I think you also need to get the story 100% correct. We were finding many non registered avcommers that were voting. That way there can be no control over the voting process and can lead to any person registering a bunch of free mail addresses on hotmail and vote for 1 photo and hence skewing the vote.
It has zippo to do with if someone is passionate or not. All pilots are passionate whether they fly cloth, tin, plastic.
There were negative comments this side too - but did anyone add their 2c to that - No!
Sometimes I wonder if the perceived rift is not caused by your own thinking.
Hear heardemon wrote:guys i cant believe some of that stuff...
just wait for the microlight calender which is going to print next week
Talk about a red rag to a bullWeg wrote:.... I doubt if you would have been brave enough to canvass all microlighters on Avcom. Giving the link and the photo number to vote for is really not encouraging fair choice!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests