BANG FOR THE BUCK
- Tumbleweed
- Toooooo Thousand
- Posts: 2349
- Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 7:14 pm
- Location: FASC
Re: BANG FOR THE BUCK
Must say, really nice seeing a pilot like Boet handling his aerrie to perfection.
Comes back to comparing STOL aerries- its the pilot in command who determines the efficiancy of the plane. This oke will give you a run for your money.
Comes back to comparing STOL aerries- its the pilot in command who determines the efficiancy of the plane. This oke will give you a run for your money.
Sling ZU FYE - For Your Entertainment
-
- Frequent Flyer
- Posts: 1262
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2010 6:31 pm
- Location: Barrydale Western Cape
Re: BANG FOR THE BUCK
One of a very few pilots I will fly with, eyes closedTumbleweed wrote:Must say, really nice seeing a pilot like Boet handling his aerrie to perfection.
Comes back to comparing STOL aerries- its the pilot in command who determines the efficiancy of the plane. This oke will give you a run for your money.

Jean
The new front seat solo Cubby MK2 powered by Rotax 912 S 100hp
Cubby Aircraft Factory
Suppliers of Nitrate, Butyrate, adhesive, Fabric
Email: cubbyaircraftfactory@gmail.com
0726716240
Jean Crous
SACAA Approved Person 402
Cubby Aircraft Factory
Suppliers of Nitrate, Butyrate, adhesive, Fabric
Email: cubbyaircraftfactory@gmail.com
0726716240
Jean Crous
SACAA Approved Person 402
Re: BANG FOR THE BUCK
IBIS MAGIC GS 700 ?
Re: BANG FOR THE BUCK
Assuming the "bang" part means performance then the Pioneer 300 as it's one of the quickest and also aerobatic.
- Turbo
- Top Gun
- Posts: 747
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 3:49 pm
- Location: TurboDirect the home of Garrett Turbochargers
- Contact:
Re: BANG FOR THE BUCK
so many planes, so little money!!
Cheetah
Sport Cruizer
Zenair CH701
Raven - just without anything ROTAX - Rotax=RIP OFF
Cheetah
Sport Cruizer
Zenair CH701
Raven - just without anything ROTAX - Rotax=RIP OFF
Re: BANG FOR THE BUCK
Rotax is a damn good engine. You know it. The only thing wrong with it, is the price.
- Turbo
- Top Gun
- Posts: 747
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 3:49 pm
- Location: TurboDirect the home of Garrett Turbochargers
- Contact:
Re: BANG FOR THE BUCK
So is the lycoming, continental, Jabi, UL, Revmaster, etc etc ---
Rotax is simply - a rip off - the local guys at aviation engines charge more than anyone else in the world for the same parts, i imported my own parts from abroad and landed them here for more than 30% less than aviation engines charges, and the response from the indian guy at aviation engines was simple - "oh well" -- lovely....

Rotax is simply - a rip off - the local guys at aviation engines charge more than anyone else in the world for the same parts, i imported my own parts from abroad and landed them here for more than 30% less than aviation engines charges, and the response from the indian guy at aviation engines was simple - "oh well" -- lovely....


- Rhodie
- Ready for the first flight
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 7:02 am
- Location: Circus Airfield
Re: BANG FOR THE BUCK
I have over 400 hours logged sitting behind a Rotax. Price does not come into the factor when reliability is a major concern. I have flown other aircraft with different motors, and have had a few scares, Rotax for me is the only option in an LSA aircraft
As in all businesses, profit is not a swear word, and is acceptable, I don't think 30% is a major rip off.
Neil
As in all businesses, profit is not a swear word, and is acceptable, I don't think 30% is a major rip off.
Neil
Re: BANG FOR THE BUCK
Savannah 

Re: BANG FOR THE BUCK
Fix wing lsa. Bush cat (cheetah). Weight shift Aquilla 582
- Turbo
- Top Gun
- Posts: 747
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 3:49 pm
- Location: TurboDirect the home of Garrett Turbochargers
- Contact:
Re: BANG FOR THE BUCK
I have other aircraft with different engines in them, including a continental - which is as reliable as the sun coming up in the morning and setting at night - point is Rotax is NOT the only reliable engine in the world, as listed above. profit is most certainly NOT a dirty word - BUT aviation engines are a RIP OFF!! I'm happy to go into specifics to prove the point - but a carb rubber adapter for a 912 sells for R1400.00 incl Vat at Aviation engines -- i LANDED these after duties and VAT from the USA (SAME ROTAX ORIGINAL PART) for R712.00 -- now where is your 30%??Rhodie wrote:I have over 400 hours logged sitting behind a Rotax. Price does not come into the factor when reliability is a major concern. I have flown other aircraft with different motors, and have had a few scares, Rotax for me is the only option in an LSA aircraft
As in all businesses, profit is not a swear word, and is acceptable, I don't think 30% is a major rip off.
Neil
-
- The Big Four K
- Posts: 5052
- Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 7:09 am
- Location: Mooketsi,Duiwelskloof
- Contact:
Re: BANG FOR THE BUCK
Jy het seker nog nie 'n Cobra gevlieg nie...net jammer hul diens is so slegwitwillem wrote:Fix wing lsa. Bush cat (cheetah). Weight shift Aquilla 582

- Rhodie
- Ready for the first flight
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 7:02 am
- Location: Circus Airfield
Re: BANG FOR THE BUCK
[/quote]
I have other aircraft with different engines in them, including a continental - which is as reliable as the sun coming up in the morning and setting at night - point is Rotax is NOT the only reliable engine in the world, as listed above. profit is most certainly NOT a dirty word - BUT aviation engines are a RIP OFF!! I'm happy to go into specifics to prove the point - but a carb rubber adapter for a 912 sells for R1400.00 incl Vat at Aviation engines -- i LANDED these after duties and VAT from the USA (SAME ROTAX ORIGINAL PART) for R712.00 -- now where is your 30%??[/quote]
Its not my 30%, its your 30%, read your earlier post, also read my post again, never said Rotax is the only reliable motor, but most certainly my choice for an LSA .
I don't have a problem for what I get charged for Rotax parts.
Alanmac started this topic with the intentions to find out what is our preferred aerie ( Cheetah for me). Not to use this platform to publicly bad mouth companies we have a grip with.
Just to be clear here, I have absolutely no affiliation with this company or Rotax,
Alanmac, Apologies for your thread been hijacked. This is my last post with regards to this issue.
I have other aircraft with different engines in them, including a continental - which is as reliable as the sun coming up in the morning and setting at night - point is Rotax is NOT the only reliable engine in the world, as listed above. profit is most certainly NOT a dirty word - BUT aviation engines are a RIP OFF!! I'm happy to go into specifics to prove the point - but a carb rubber adapter for a 912 sells for R1400.00 incl Vat at Aviation engines -- i LANDED these after duties and VAT from the USA (SAME ROTAX ORIGINAL PART) for R712.00 -- now where is your 30%??[/quote]
Its not my 30%, its your 30%, read your earlier post, also read my post again, never said Rotax is the only reliable motor, but most certainly my choice for an LSA .
I don't have a problem for what I get charged for Rotax parts.
Alanmac started this topic with the intentions to find out what is our preferred aerie ( Cheetah for me). Not to use this platform to publicly bad mouth companies we have a grip with.
Just to be clear here, I have absolutely no affiliation with this company or Rotax,
Alanmac, Apologies for your thread been hijacked. This is my last post with regards to this issue.
- Leprachaun
- Frequent Flyer
- Posts: 1161
- Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 12:57 pm
- Location: Pretoria
Re: BANG FOR THE BUCK
LSA I would choose the Bushcat and trike the Aquilla Leprachaun
A pilot lives by perfection , or not at all!
- Turbo
- Top Gun
- Posts: 747
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 3:49 pm
- Location: TurboDirect the home of Garrett Turbochargers
- Contact:
Re: BANG FOR THE BUCK
I have other aircraft with different engines in them, including a continental - which is as reliable as the sun coming up in the morning and setting at night - point is Rotax is NOT the only reliable engine in the world, as listed above. profit is most certainly NOT a dirty word - BUT aviation engines are a RIP OFF!! I'm happy to go into specifics to prove the point - but a carb rubber adapter for a 912 sells for R1400.00 incl Vat at Aviation engines -- i LANDED these after duties and VAT from the USA (SAME ROTAX ORIGINAL PART) for R712.00 -- now where is your 30%??[/quote]Rhodie wrote:
Its not my 30%, its your 30%, read your earlier post, also read my post again, never said Rotax is the only reliable motor, but most certainly my choice for an LSA .
I don't have a problem for what I get charged for Rotax parts.
Alanmac started this topic with the intentions to find out what is our preferred aerie ( Cheetah for me). Not to use this platform to publicly bad mouth companies we have a grip with.
Just to be clear here, I have absolutely no affiliation with this company or Rotax,
Alanmac, Apologies for your thread been hijacked. This is my last post with regards to this issue.[/quote]
Publicly listing the issues with aviation engines is what you would expect them to react to and focus on customers requirements.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests